International
Code of Botanical Nomenclature
The foundation
of international code of botanical nomenclature are found in linnaeus (book
name) philosophia botanica in 1751, where in he proposed certain principle of
nomenclature and other significant work on plant nomenclature was Augustin de-candolle
Theorie elementareae de ta botanique 1813 which give detail rule on plant
nomenclature.
However the
first organize effort to develop a precise and simple system of nomenclature to
be used by botanist in all countries were made at the 1st international botanical congress held in 1867
in paris. At this congress the laws of botanical nomenclature proposed by
Alphone De-candolle. He was son of A.De-candolle were adopted with some modification as a
guide for nomenclature in plant kingdom. These rules are known as D.candolle
rules or Paris code of 1867.
The subsequent
internal botanical congress made significant contribution with regard to plant
nomenclature, but it was only at Cambridge in 1930, that for the 1st time in
botanical history a code of nomenclature came into being. That was international
function as well as name.
The rule of
nomenclature adopted at Cambridge congress were subjected to some changes and
refinement from time to time. However in 12th botanical congress held in Russia
in august 1975. The 15 botanical congress held at Tokyo 1993.
The code is
divided into three parts.
(i)Principle (ii)Rules
and (iii) Recommendation.
Principle form the
basis for system of botanical nomenclature.
Rules six principle
rules of code are as follow
1.
The
botanical nomenclature is independent of zoological nomenclature.
2.
The
application of name of taxonomy group is determined by means by nomenclature type.
3.
The
nomenclature of taxonomy group is based upon priority of publication.
4.
Each
taxonomic group bear only one correct name, the earliest that is in accordance
with rules of except in specific cases.
5.
Scientific
name of taxonomy group are treated as Latin regardless of their derivation.
6.
The
rules of nomenclature are retroactive.
Recommendation are
often practice application of the rules, their object to bring about uniformity
and clearness, Specially in future nomenclature.
The code has
three appendixes.
1)
Deals
with name of hybrid.
2)
Nomina
familiarum conservanda includes the names of families which are conserved.
3)
Nomina
generica conservenda ET.Rejiscenda
4)
list
the name of genera against the priority of publication because of their long
use.
Rules Of Nomenclature
Type method
1.
Holotype
2.
Lactotype
3.
Syntype
4.
Isotype
5.
Neotype
6.
Topotype
Type method/ Typification:
1. Holotype: is a single type designated by the original author of a taxon is known as
holotype.
2. Isotype: are duplicates of the holotype often being sent to the
herbaria. Isotype from single collection, that contain the holotype.
3. Syntype: are two or more specimen designated by the original author when no
holotype was designated.
4. Lactotype: is one of the syntype subsequently chosen from the syntype to act in
place of holotype.
5. Neotype: is a specimen designated to act in place of a holotype. when no holotype
and syntype exist. In some cases when all the material in which the description
of new species was based is missing, then the neotype must be selected and
selection once made must be followed by the subsequent botanist.
6. Topotype: is a specimen collected from the same
locality from where the holotype was collected previously.
Plural
adjective and is formed by adding the suffix 'aceae' to the legitimate the name
of genus; e.g Rosaceae from Rosa, Cucurbitaceae from Cucurbita
etc.
Special
exception is made for the following 8 families.
The
names because of long usage are treated as validly published. For these
families alternate name are primitive in the code.
·
Palmaceae - Arecaceae
·
Guttiferae
- Clusiaceae
·
Compositae - Astraceae
·
Umbelliferae - Apiaceae
·
Leguminosae - Fabaceae
·
Graminae - Poaceae
·
Labiatae - Lamiaceae
·
Cruciferae - Brassicaceae
International Code of Botanical Nomenclature
Reviewed by SaQLaiN HaShMi
on
7:33 PM
Rating:
No comments: